Biological Diversity at Risk From Wireless Radiation

Biological Diversity at Risk From Wireless Radiation

by Kim Goldberg
December 28, 2017

An international team of conservation scientists and ecologists has listed wireless radiation as one of the top emerging issues that could threaten global biological diversity in coming years.

In its ninth annual “horizon scan” to identify emerging issues affecting biological diversity, the Cambridge Conservation Initiative listed electromagnetic radiation from 5G technology as one of 15 top emerging issues to potentially threaten wildlife. The 15 issues were selected from a list of 117 possible candidates. The Cambridge Conservation Initiative is funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB).

The “2018 Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation and Biological Diversity” was published in the January 2018 issue of Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 3, No. 1.

Read the full report here: 2018 Horizon Scan.

“Our aim is to highlight systematically both risks and opportunities to the conservation of biological diversity that are not widely known by conservation scientists and decision makers,” writes lead author William Sutherland. “Horizon scanning can help reduce the degree for conservation biology to be a crisis discipline.”

The entry for Electromagnetic Radiation in the article is printed in its entirety below:

Potential Effects on Wildlife of Increases in Electromagnetic Radiation

Understanding the potential effects of nonionising radiation on wildlife could become more relevant with the expected adoption of new mobile network technology (5G), which could connect 100 billion devices by 2025. During use, mobile telephones and other smart devices generate radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs), a form of nonionising radiation, which may change biological processes such as neurotransmitter functions, cellular metabolism, and gene and protein expression in certain types of cells, even at low intensities [82]. The notion of risk to human health remains controversial, but there is limited evidence of increased tumour risk in animals [83]. 5G uses the largely untapped bandwidth of the millimetre wave-length, between 30 and 300 GHz on the radio spectrum, which uses smaller base stations than current wireless technology. As a result, wireless antennae may be placed densely throughout neighbourhoods on infrastructure such as lamp posts, utility poles, and buildings. This could expose wildlife to more near-field radiation. Although some studies reported negative associations between electromagnetic field strength (radiofrequencies and microwaves: 1 MHz-3 GHz range) and species, for example the density and abundance of house sparrows ( Passer domesticus ) [84,85], these studies have not yielded clear empirical evidence that the observed effects are due to RF-EMFs. The potential effects of RF-EMFs on most taxonomic groups, including migratory birds, bats, and bees, are largely unknown. The evidence to inform the development of exposure guidelines for 5G technology is limited, raising the possibility of unintended biological consequences [86].

6 thoughts on “Biological Diversity at Risk From Wireless Radiation

    1. Kim Goldberg Post author

      Thanks! It’s an important breakthrough. The risks of wireless radiation to all living things has not previously been on the radar of conservation organizations and wildlife biologists. Maybe that will now change with this listing of its risk to biodiversity.

      Reply
  1. Vicky Lien

    wireless radiation makes me sick. I have no wireless devices in my home. but it is every where I go. I never thought about the affects on the animals outside. I do believe it affected my dog. 10 to 15 min tops on a computer and i have to get off. the pain in my hands and arms is terrible. gotta go

    Reply
    1. Kim Goldberg Post author

      Thanks for sharing your experience, Vicky. Other people have also noticed effects of electromagnetic radiation on their pets, and some veterinarians are even aware of this problem now.

      And good luck with computer problem! I had a great deal of trouble of getting EMF-sick whenever I used my computer (which for me as a writer is daily!). I had to change my computing set-up by buying a low-emissions monitor and some very long connector cables for monitor, keyboard and mouse so that the computer itself is a greater distance from me, and printer is in another room. In my case that worked. But everyone is different.

      Reply
  2. Misha

    Great read! Wireless radiation is something lots of people do not talk about! It effects everybody. It is great to stay aware of these issues. Keep up the great posts!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s